Currently we have no less than three different, but very similar, factories for reading built-in CMap files, standard font files, and wasm files on the main-thread.[1]
These factories were added at different points in time, since I cannot imagine that we'd add essentially three copies of the same code otherwise.
Nowadays these factories are often not even used[2], since worker-thread fetching is used whenever possible to improve performance. In particular, they will *only* be used when either:
- The PDF.js library runs in Node.js environments.
- The user manually sets `useWorkerFetch = false` when calling `getDocument`.
- The user provides custom `CMapReaderFactory`, `StandardFontDataFactory`, and/or `WasmFactory` instances when calling `getDocument`.
By replacing these factories with *a single* new `BinaryDataFactory` factory/option the number of `getDocument` options are thus reduced, which cannot hurt.
This also reduces the total bundle-size of the Firefox PDF Viewer a little bit, and it slightly reduces the number of import maps that need to be maintained.
*Please note:* For users that provide custom `CMapReaderFactory`, `StandardFontDataFactory`, and `WasmFactory` instances when calling `getDocument` this will be a breaking change, however it's unlikely that (many) such users exist.
(The *internal* format data-format of `CMapReaderFactory` was changed in PR 18951, and there hasn't been a single question/complaint about it in well over a year.)
---
[1] Any new functionality could easily lead to more such factories being added in the future, which wouldn't be great.
[2] Note that the Firefox PDF Viewer no longer use these factories, since it "forcibly" sets `useWorkerFetch = true` during building.
The `BaseCMapReaderFactory`, `BaseStandardFontDataFactory`, and `BaseWasmFactory` classes are all very similar, and the only difference is really in their respective `fetch` methods.
By have the worker-thread "compute" the complete `filename` it's possible to simplify the `BaseCMapReaderFactory.prototype.fetch` method, which will allow future improvements to all of these classes.
A couple of things to note:
- This code is unused, and it's not even bundled, in the Firefox PDF Viewer.
- In browsers it's unused by default, and worker-thread fetching will always be used when possible since that's more efficient.
*Please note:* For users that provide a custom `CMapReaderFactory` instance when calling `getDocument` this could be a breaking change, however it's unlikely that any such users exist.
(The *internal* format of this data was changed previously in PR 18951, and there hasn't been a single question/complaint about it in well over a year.)
Given that these classes are only used from the "FetchBinaryData" message handler, the `name`/`filename` parameters should never actually be missing and if they are that's a bug elsewhere in the code-base.
Furthermore a missing `name`/`filename` parameter would result in a "nonsense" URL and the actual data fetching would then fail instead, hence keeping this old validation code just doesn't seem necessary.
After the changes in PR 20197 the code in the `TranslatedFont.prototype.send` method is not all that readable[1] given how it handles e.g. the `charProcOperatorList` data used with Type3 fonts.
Since this is the only spot where `Font.prototype.exportData` is used, it seems much simpler to move the `compileFontInfo` call there and *directly* return the intended data rather than messing with it after the fact.
Finally, while it doesn't really matter, the patch flips the order of the `charProcOperatorList` and `extra` properties throughout the code-base since the former is used with Type3 fonts while the latter (effectively) requires that debugging is enabled.
---
[1] I had to re-read it twice, also looking at all the involved methods, in order to convince myself that it's actually correct.
When getting the extracted document, the url for the wasms wasn't passed
and consequently the icc-based color wasn't rendered as expected because of the wasm for qcms.
The bots currently detect if the tests failed or not by checking the
output text, but this is error-prone as it would break if the text gets
changed (which is rather unexpected) and it's non-standard as usually
processes report success/failure via their exit code.
This commit makes sure that the test process fails with a non-zero exit
code if the tests failed, and a zero exit code otherwise. Note that we
keep the same output text as before, so this change should not impact
the bots, but it does form another step to unlock usage in GitHub
Actions (which uses the exit code of commands to determine the status of
the workflow run).