- The `stopAtErrors` API option, which is the inverse of the "internal" `ignoreErrors` option, is explicitly documented as applying to *parsing* (i.e. the worker-thread) while the `FontFaceObject` class is used during rendering (i.e. the main-thread); see b6765403a1/src/display/api.js (L164-L167)
- A glyph that fails in the `FontRendererFactory`, on the worker-thread, will already cause (overall) parsing to stop when `ignoreErrors === false` hence checking the option on the main-thread as well seems redundant; see b6765403a1/src/core/evaluator.js (L4527-L4533)
- Removing this option simplifies the code, and slightly reduces the number of options that we need to handle in the main-thread code.
This avoids having to add a couple of event listeners in the viewer, when debugging is enabled, and is consistent with the existing handling of `FontInspector` and `StepperManager` in the API.
- Check that the `filename` is actually a string, before parsing it further.
- Use proper "shadowing" in the `filename` getter.
- Add a bit more validation of the data in `pickPlatformItem`.
- Last, but not least, return both the original `filename` and the (path stripped) variant needed in the display-layer and viewer.
It fixes issues #14982 and #14724.
The main problem of upscaling a canvas is that it can induces some pixelation
(see issue #14724). So this patch is just removing the limit and as a side
effect it fixes issue #14982.
As far as I can tell, in looking different profiles (especially some memory profile)
in using the Firefox profiler, I don't see any noticeable difference in term of
memory use.
and implement then in using some SVG filters and composition.
Composing in using destination-in in order to multiply RGB components by
the alpha from the mask isn't perfect: it'd be a way better to natively have
alpha masks support, it induces some small rounding errors and consequently
computed RGB are approximatively correct.
In term of performance, it's a real improvement, for example, the pdf in
issue #17779 is now rendered in few seconds.
There are still some room for improvement, but overall it should be a way
better.
Rather than having to handle this *manually* throughout the viewer, this functionality can instead be moved into the API which simplifies the code slightly.
*Note:* This borrows a helper function from the viewer, however the code cannot be directly shared since the worker-thread has access to various primitives.
In PR 17428 this functionality was limited to "larger" images, to not affect performance negatively. However it turns out that it's also beneficial to consider more "complex" images, regardless of their size, that contain /SMask or /Mask data; see issue 11518.
Given that the `decode` method only returns the actual image-data, a user would now need to invoke `parseImageProperties` to obtain e.g. the width and height.
This method only accepts `BaseStream`-instances, which are (obviously) not exposed, hence we extend it in IMAGE_DECODERS builds to wrap TypedArray data into the expected format.
This commit changes the `JpxImage.decode` method signature to define the
`ignoreColorSpace` argument as optional with a default value. Note that
we already set this default value in the `getBytes` method of the
`src/core/decode_stream.js` file since this option only seems useful for
certain special cases and therefore shouldn't be mandatory to provide.
Moreover, the JPX fuzzer is changed to use the new `JpxImage` API.
This patch updates the minimum supported browsers as follows:
- Safari 16.4, which was released on 2023-03-27; see https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safari-release-notes/safari-16_4-release-notes
Nowadays we usually we try, where feasible and possible, to support browsers/environments that are about two years old. The reasons for limiting support to a slightly more recent Safari version include:
- Safari has always been slower, compared to other browsers, at implementing e.g. new JavaScript features.
- Trying to provide support for Safari is often difficult, and over the years we have seen *a lot* of bugs that are specific to Safari.
- Safari is, and has been for many years, only listed as "mostly" supported in the FAQ.
- This allows us to remove feature-testing, only relevant to Safari, from the main code-base.
By limiting support to only "recent" browsers we reduce the risk of holding back improvements of the built-in Firefox PDF Viewer, and also (significantly) reduce the maintenance/support burden for the PDF.js core contributors.
*Please note:* As always, the minimum supported browser version assumes that a `legacy`-build of the PDF.js library is being used; see https://github.com/mozilla/pdf.js/wiki/Frequently-Asked-Questions#faq-support
